Review: AMD Radeon Pro W6800 Workstation GPU


This website may perhaps get paid affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Conditions of use.

AMD Radeon Pro W6800

As soon as once more, AMD has launched some rock-the-residence workstation GPUs at aggressive costs. The W6800 ($2249) and W6600 ($649) are designed to go head-to-head with Nvidia’s most effective. We’ve been hammering absent with a W6800 and are amazed. We’ll relate what we’ve discovered, about each it and its smaller sibling the W6600, and thoughts about regardless of whether they are right for you. Spoiler warn: As with any GPU not too long ago, a massive issue will be the precise street selling price, since none of them appear to be to be obtainable at MSRP.

AMD W6800, W6600, and W6600M by the Numbers

AMD’s new workstation GPU family includes the W6800 and W6600 desktop cards and a W6600M for cell equipment. All are constructed all-around AMD’s 7nm RDNA 2 architecture and have comprehensive ISV driver certification for scientific, engineering, and imaginative experienced apps. Electrical power effectiveness has also been enhanced throughout the products line.

The flagship of the spouse and children, AMD Radeon Pro W6800 is a monster of a desktop GPU. It capabilities 32GB of large-speed ECC GDDR6 RAM, and sporting activities a complete of approximately 27 billion transistors. It has 3,840 stream processors in 60 compute models that are capable of a theoretical 1,783 TFlops of FP32 effectiveness. The PCIe 4.-ready card supports up to two 8K shows or 6 4K shows. There are also 60 components ray-tracing processors. Whole specs.

AMD is positioning the W6800 head to head with Nvidia's top Quadro cards as you can see from this chart

AMD is positioning the W6800 head to head with Nvidia’s top rated Quadro cards as you can see from this chart.

The AMD Radeon Professional W6600 is a one-slot, reduced-charge board utilizing the exact same architecture, but with only 8GB of non-ECC GDDR6 RAM and one,792 stream processors. It does however consist of 28 ray-tracing accelerators. It can generate up to four 4K shows or 1 8K exhibit (full specs). The 6600M model, for embedding in laptops or other equipment, has fundamentally similar technical specs, with overall performance dependent partially on how an OEM configures its electrical power envelope within just its 65 to 90-watt assortment (whole specs).

Employing the AMD Radeon Professional W6800

I have been fortunate enough to have a pre-release model of the W6800 with a pre-launch driver, so I set it by its paces for a several times. For starters, it is modern, properly-created, and suits properly in both of those the to start with and second twin slots of my test rig. It does have energy connectors at the finish of its length, so if your case is snug, you may well have to order a few of these cute little adapters that let you operate the ability cords from the other facet. It has 6 mini-DisplayPort connectors on a single side of the back again panel and a grille on the other.

I ran it the two in tandem with an Nvidia 1080 and by alone in each of the very first and second slots in my i7-equipped examination rig. It executed flawlessly in all all those configurations. As a facet observe, I was impressed far more apps utilized equally GPUs than I predicted, primarily if some shows had been on each and every. For my tests, even though, I just had the W6800 in the 1st, 16x, slot.

The AMD Radeon Pro W6800 is a top-performer in Floating Point, based on these benchmarks from AMD

The AMD Radeon Professional W6800 is a prime-performer in floating place, centered on these benchmarks from AMD. I really don’t have a Quadro RTX 5000 to try out to duplicate the results, but I do have a Radeon Pro W5700 and the 6800 carried out as nicely or far better in my 3D checks as in these benchmarks.

A single location AMD has shown energy when compared with Nvidia in its 5000 sequence of playing cards was mixed workloads. They have performed a fantastic job of enabling a program to execute responsibilities that are the two CPU and GPU intensive with very little general performance degradation for either. So I made the decision to check that out with the W6800 by working Cinebench R23 and TimeSpy at the identical time on it and a 3090 (I don’t have a current product Quadro), and seeking at how functioning each influenced the quantities for when they ended up each individual operate individually. This time, equally setups carried out impressively. CPU figures were off 10 to 12 per cent, but GPU functionality diminished by considerably less than five p.c.

AMD Demonstrate Photographers Some Love with Luminar and PureRAW Support

I was pleasantly shocked to see two of the image utilities I depend on described in the push briefing for the new playing cards. DxO’s PureRAW does a uniquely highly effective task of pre-processing Raw data files and leaving them as (mosaiced) Uncooked files for more processing. It relies on the company’s sector-major DeepPRIME AI-improved sound reduction, which can take ages on a CPU or slow GPU. The W6800 collapsed that to just a few of seconds for just about every of the 100 45MP Nikon D850 photos I threw at it. Total processing time was still all-around 20 seconds for every impression, but 90 percent of it was tasks carried out on the CPU.

Luminar AI has also extra help for the W6800. It undoubtedly appeared snappy, comparable to my program with an RTX 3090, but I didn’t test and do any unique benchmarks. In any scenario, it is a excellent pattern both equally to see AMD reaching out to a wide variety of revolutionary software package businesses and that all those businesses are responding. My colleague Joel has frequently composed about instances where AMD has gotten short-shrift from sellers in the previous.

AMD is particularly proud of the noise reduction and ray-tracing performance of the W6800. copy

AMD is specifically proud of the sound reduction and ray-tracing efficiency of the W6800. copy

CUDA Is A lot less of an Difficulty, but However a Thorn

AMD touts its assistance for the AI tech in Luminar AI and SuperRaw as illustrations of their rising presence in AI. But for practitioners of AI, equipment understanding, and some other GPGPU disciplines, CUDA help is even now a major offer and suggests AMD GPUs really do not usually enable speed up popular tasks in these fields. The very good news is that around time, much more software program is transferring to cross-system frameworks.

Cost and Availability? What Are Individuals?

It is truly tough to say no matter if the WX6800 or WX6600 are a fantastic benefit or worth buying without recognizing how really hard they will be to get, or how a great deal you will seriously have to pay out. For gamers, unless of course you have a really unconventional predicament, the non-Professional Radeon 6000-collection cards are a much better price — if you can get them. But for these who need certified drivers and formal ISV help, the workstation styles will be a superior solution, once more dependent on what they wind up truly costing. Centered on my testing, and the company’s benchmarks, they are amazing compared with other AMD and Nvidia workstation choices, at the very least if you can get them at MSRP.

We’ll have to see how the industry charges them to get a far better plan of their small-term value proposition. AMD is making the playing cards offered commencing instantly, but specified latest GPU launches, it is tricky to know what that means in terms of ordering on. As to the W6600M, unless of course you are a system maker, it’ll be wait-and-see as laptops applying the chip start off to roll out. The first one announced is the HP Fury ZBook G8 cell workstation which will start off to be out there in July.

Now Browse:

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.